that the
affower deficiency of
50 sheets of four
did not
actually
cent stamps
ex vot
the
mistake kawing by ariven from the fact that, through clerical error in Messrs. Hela
kue's invoice dated the pJuly 1903, it was made to affecr that 5055 pleats of four cent
>
Cause
were
finally adopted, the ciso were not referred to the CA for the
Clowes, who, in reply to enquiries
on the
subject, assert that
not foarte for
it is
an excess number of
sheets of stamps to be despatched
stamps had been received in
the Colony, whereas,
shown by
the amount charged in the invoice
and also by the packing cett., 5005
okes to only
wreme
actually suffled;
while in the latter case it affects
to be possible that the assumed
our plus
was due to a
similar cause
somewhat
perhaps I is unfortunate
that, before the conclusions which
were
arrived at in the Colony in
connection with the last mentioned
case
DRAFT.
by them,
rouggest
that this
My
ALT.
Mr.
MINUTE.
Mr. Grindle.
Mr. Lambert.
Mr. Read.
Sir G. Fiddes.
Mr. Hewins,
Mr. Long.
particular discrepancy was possibly
due to the confusing of the stamps of
different values.
J. As matters stand, it cannot be held to be definitely clear that the alleged surplus
of
10 sheets of 60 $1 stamps,
бо
5 cheats of 60 $1.50 stamps
did in fact exist at the end of
1915, and, having regard
doubt on this point,
to be some
there
to the
affeers
justification for
My Thomson's suggestion in his
minute
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.